← Back to BlogLire en Français
Reviews & Analysis

Andrew Huberman on Breathing: Critical Analysis of the Best Episodes

Critical guide to Huberman Lab breathwork episodes. Direct links, rating system, guest analysis, and their potential conflicts of interest.

AxelJanuary 11, 202611 min read
Andrew Huberman on Breathing: Critical Analysis of the Best Episodes

Huberman Lab & Breathwork: Critical Guide to the Best Episodes

Dr. Andrew Huberman, a Stanford neuroscientist, has become one of the most influential voices in health science communication. His podcast frequently covers breathwork—but what is the actual quality of this content?

6 episodes analyzed, scores from 3.0/5 to 4.6/5. Key finding: academic guests (Feldman, Spiegel, Epel) score highest for rigor, while commercial guests (Mackenzie) have significant conflicts of interest to consider6 episodes analyzed, scores from 3.0/5 to 4.6/5. Key finding: academic guests (Feldman, Spiegel, Epel) score highest for rigor, while commercial guests (Mackenzie) have significant conflicts of interest to consider

This guide ranks key episodes from best to worst with a critical eye: direct links, rating system, and honest evaluation of guests.

Rating System

Each episode is rated on 5 criteria (★ to ★★★★★):

CriterionWhat We Evaluate
Scientific RigorStudies cited, nuance, acknowledgment of limitations
ApplicabilityConcrete and realistic protocols
AccessibilityClarity for non-experts
ObjectivityAbsence of commercial or promotional bias
Guest ExpertisePublications, academic recognition

#1: Elissa Epel — Stress, Breathing & Cellular Aging ⭐ 4.6/5

Dr. Elissa Epel on Huberman LabDr. Elissa Epel on Huberman Lab

Dr. Elissa Epel: Control Stress for Healthy Eating, Metabolism & Aging

Duration: 2h03 | Guest: Dr. Elissa Epel | Date: April 2023

About the Guest

Dr. Elissa Epel is Professor and Vice Chair of Psychiatry at UCSF, co-author of "The Telomere Effect" with Nobel Laureate Elizabeth Blackburn, and author of "The Stress Prescription."

AspectEvaluation
Academic publicationsHighly cited researcher (top 0.1% globally)
H-indexVery high (60,000+ citations)
Conflicts of interestBook sales, but no breathwork products
RecognitionMember of the National Academy of Medicine

Rating

CriterionScoreComment
Scientific Rigor★★★★★World-class stress researcher
Applicability★★★★☆Practical stress management tools
Accessibility★★★★★Clear, engaging communication
Objectivity★★★★☆Minimal commercial bias
Guest Expertise★★★★★Leading authority on stress and aging

Overall Score: 4.6/5

Strengths

  • Pioneer in stress-telomere research—groundbreaking work on cellular aging
  • Discusses breathwork (including Wim Hof) from a scientific perspective
  • Explains how stress interventions work at the cellular level
  • Very honest about what we know and don't know

Questionable Points

  • Less focused specifically on breathing techniques
  • Some overlap with general stress management content
  • Book promotion present but not excessive

Takeaway

The best episode for understanding stress and breathwork from a rigorous scientific perspective. Epel brings world-class credentials and explains the science behind why breathwork affects cellular aging. Essential viewing for anyone interested in the science of stress reduction.


#2: Deliberate Cold Exposure (Solo) ⭐ 4.4/5

Deliberate Cold Exposure - Huberman LabDeliberate Cold Exposure - Huberman Lab

Using Deliberate Cold Exposure for Health and Performance

Duration: 2h12 | Type: Solo episode | Date: April 2022

Rating

CriterionScoreComment
Scientific Rigor★★★★★Thorough research citations, nuanced presentation
Applicability★★★★★Very concrete protocols with specific numbers
Accessibility★★★★★Excellent pedagogy, clear explanations
Objectivity★★★☆☆Sponsor promotions at start (AG1, etc.)
Expertise★★★★☆Neuroscientist, expert in adjacent fields

Overall Score: 4.4/5

Strengths

  • Comprehensive scientific coverage—dopamine, norepinephrine, metabolism mechanisms
  • Specific protocols: temperature ranges, duration, timing, frequency
  • Explains the difference between cold for mood vs. performance vs. recovery
  • Addresses common mistakes (rewarming too quickly, timing around workouts)
  • Covers glabrous skin cooling for performance enhancement

Questionable Points

  • Recurring sponsors promoted at the start (AG1, LMNT)
  • Very long episode—may be overwhelming for beginners
  • Some extrapolations from animal studies to humans

Key Protocols

  1. For mood/alertness: 1-3 min cold exposure, any time of day
  2. For metabolism: Allow natural rewarming (no hot shower after)
  3. For recovery: Wait 4+ hours after strength training
  4. Temperature: Cold enough to make you want to get out but safe to stay in
  5. Frequency: 11 min/week total, divided across sessions

Takeaway

The definitive Huberman episode on cold exposure. Scientifically rigorous, immediately actionable, and covers both the mechanisms and practical applications. Essential viewing for anyone interested in using cold for health benefits.


#3: Jack Feldman — The Neuroscientist of Breathing ⭐ 4.2/5

Dr. Jack Feldman on Huberman LabDr. Jack Feldman on Huberman Lab

Dr. Jack Feldman: Breathing for Mental & Physical Health

Duration: 2h45 | Guest: Dr. Jack Feldman | Date: January 2022

About the Guest

Dr. Jack Feldman is a professor of neurobiology at UCLA, discoverer of the "preBötzinger complex"—the respiratory rhythm generator in the brain.

AspectEvaluation
Academic publications300+ peer-reviewed articles
H-index~80 (very high)
Conflicts of interestNone identified
RecognitionMember of the National Academy of Sciences

Rating

CriterionScoreComment
Scientific Rigor★★★★★World expert, very nuanced
Applicability★★★☆☆More theoretical than practical
Accessibility★★★☆☆Technical at times
Objectivity★★★★★No apparent conflict of interest
Guest Expertise★★★★★World authority on the subject

Overall Score: 4.2/5

Strengths

  • Maximum credibility—40 years of breathing research
  • Explains actual neural mechanisms
  • Very honest about what we don't know yet
  • No products to sell

Questionable Points

  • Episode harder to follow for non-experts
  • Fewer immediately practical protocols
  • May seem "dry" compared to other guests

Takeaway

This is the most scientifically solid episode on the list. Feldman is a true expert with an impeccable career. If you want to understand the deep science, this is the one.

My personal favorite — This episode completely changed how I think about breathing. Feldman's humility and scientific rigor are refreshing in a space full of hype.


#4: David Spiegel — The Stanford Cyclic Sighing Study ⭐ 4.2/5

Dr. David Spiegel on Huberman LabDr. David Spiegel on Huberman Lab

Dr. David Spiegel: Using Hypnosis to Enhance Health & Performance

Duration: 2h30 | Guest: Dr. David Spiegel | Date: January 2024

About the Guest

Dr. David Spiegel is a professor of psychiatry at Stanford, director of the Center on Stress and Health, co-author of the cyclic sighing study.

AspectEvaluation
Academic publications400+ peer-reviewed articles
H-index~100 (exceptional)
Conflicts of interestCo-founder of Reveri (paid hypnosis app)
RecognitionMajor figure in psychiatry

Rating

CriterionScoreComment
Scientific Rigor★★★★★Presents his own study with nuance
Applicability★★★★☆Simple cyclic sighing technique
Accessibility★★★★☆Clear despite complexity
Objectivity★★★☆☆Promotes his app Reveri
Guest Expertise★★★★★Leading researcher

Overall Score: 4.2/5

Strengths

  • Presents the original study published in Cell Reports Medicine
  • Explains why cyclic sighing beat meditation in the study
  • Very honest about research limitations
  • Transparent methodology

Questionable Points

  • Co-founder of Reveri, a paid hypnosis app (conflict of interest)
  • The study had limitations (self-selected sample, 28 days)
  • May give the impression that cyclic sighing is "the" universal solution

Takeaway

Excellent scientific episode, but keep in mind that Spiegel has commercial interests in the mental wellness space.


#5: Breathing Fundamentals (Solo) ⭐ 4.2/5

How to Breathe Correctly - Huberman LabHow to Breathe Correctly - Huberman Lab

How to Breathe Correctly for Optimal Health, Mood, Learning & Performance

Duration: 2h16 | Type: Solo episode | Date: February 2023

Rating

CriterionScoreComment
Scientific Rigor★★★★☆Good references, some generalizations
Applicability★★★★★Very clear and testable protocols
Accessibility★★★★★Excellent pedagogy
Objectivity★★★☆☆Promotes his sponsors (AG1, etc.)
Expertise★★★★☆Neuroscientist, but not a breathing specialist

Overall Score: 4.2/5

Strengths

  • Clear explanation of the physiological sigh
  • Well-documented nasal vs. mouth breathing distinction
  • Immediately applicable protocols

Questionable Points

  • Sometimes generalizes animal studies to humans
  • Sponsors (Athletic Greens/AG1, LMNT) promoted at the start
  • Doesn't always cite study limitations

Key Protocols

  1. Physiological sigh: Double nasal inhale + long mouth exhale
  2. Box breathing: 4-4-4-4 seconds
  3. Cyclic hyperventilation: 25-30 breaths for alertness

Takeaway

The best starting point for beginners. Covers all the basics with clear protocols. Just be aware of the sponsor promotions.


#6: Brian Mackenzie — The Performance Coach ⭐ 3.0/5

Brian Mackenzie on Huberman LabBrian Mackenzie on Huberman Lab

Assess Recovery & Internal State With the CO2 Tolerance Test | Full Episode (Apple Podcasts)

Duration: 12min | Type: Huberman Lab Clip | Date: July 2024

About the Guest

Brian Mackenzie is a performance coach, founder of "The Art of Breath," and co-author of "Unplugged."

AspectEvaluation
Academic publicationsNo peer-reviewed publications
Field expertise15+ years coaching elite athletes
Conflicts of interestSells trainings, certifications, equipment
RecognitionRecognized in CrossFit world, not academic

Rating

CriterionScoreComment
Scientific Rigor★★☆☆☆Many unsourced claims
Applicability★★★★★Very concrete protocols for athletes
Accessibility★★★★☆Clear language, practical examples
Objectivity★★☆☆☆Actively promotes his products
Guest Expertise★★☆☆☆Practical experience, no research

Overall Score: 3.0/5

Strengths

  • Protocols tested on high-level athletes
  • Very practical and performance-oriented approach
  • Explains physical sensations well

Questionable Points

  • No scientific publications to support his methods
  • Sells "Art of Breath" certifications (several thousand dollars)
  • Equipment brand partnerships
  • Some claims about "CO2 tolerance" are oversimplified
  • Tendency to present his methods as superior without comparison

Takeaway

Useful for athletes seeking practical protocols, but take with critical distance. Claims aren't always scientifically verified.


Summary Table

RankEpisodeGuestExpertiseConflictsScore
1Stress & AgingElissa Epel (UCSF)★★★★★Book sales4.6/5
2Cold ExposureSolo (Huberman)★★★★☆Podcast sponsors4.4/5
3 ❤️Breathing ScienceJack Feldman (UCLA)★★★★★None4.2/5
4Cyclic SighingDavid Spiegel (Stanford)★★★★★Reveri app4.2/5
5Breathing BasicsSolo (Huberman)★★★★☆Podcast sponsors4.2/5
6PerformanceBrian Mackenzie★★☆☆☆Trainings, equipment3.0/5

Recommendations by Profile

If you want pure science

Jack Feldman (★★★★★ expertise, no conflicts)

If you want to understand stress & cellular aging

Elissa Epel (★★★★★ expertise, top-rated episode)

If you want practical protocols

Breathing Fundamentals solo episode (best science/application ratio)

If you want to understand the Stanford study

David Spiegel (study author, despite the Reveri conflict)

If you want cold exposure science

Cold Exposure Solo Episode (comprehensive protocols, solid science)

Avoid if you're looking for rigor

Brian Mackenzie (too many conflicts, no publications)


Important context: Huberman's actual expertise is vision neuroscience, not breathing. With $5-10M/year in podcast revenue and recurring sponsors (AG1, LMNT), his content is excellent popularization but should not replace peer-reviewed literatureImportant context: Huberman's actual expertise is vision neuroscience, not breathing. With $5-10M/year in podcast revenue and recurring sponsors (AG1, LMNT), his content is excellent popularization but should not replace peer-reviewed literature

Note on Andrew Huberman Himself

Profile

  • Position: Associate Professor of Neurobiology at Stanford
  • Publications: ~100 peer-reviewed articles (on vision, not breathing)
  • H-index: ~40 (respectable)
  • Actual specialty: Neuroscience of vision and visual circuits

Strengths

  • Excellent science communicator
  • Generally cites his sources
  • Long format allows for nuance

Conflicts of Interest to Know

  • Recurring sponsors: AG1 (Athletic Greens), LMNT, InsideTracker, Momentous
  • Estimated revenue: $5-10M/year via the podcast
  • Some sponsors sell products with contested efficacy

Questionable Points

  • His specialty is vision, not breathing—he popularizes others' work
  • Sometimes accused of simplifying or over-interpreting studies
  • Protocols presented as "science-based" are sometimes extrapolations
  • Doesn't always mention when a study is preliminary or on animals

Conclusion

The Huberman Lab is an excellent science communication resource, but it's not scientific literature.

Rules for using these episodes well:

  1. Do: Verify cited sources before applying
  2. Do: Prefer episodes with academic guests (Feldman, Spiegel, Epel)
  3. Caution: Be vigilant with guests who sell trainings
  4. Caution: Distinguish inspiration from information
  5. Avoid: Don't take a podcast as medical reference

Want to measure the real effect of these protocols on your body? Safe-Flow lets you track your HRV before and after breathwork sessions—objective data rather than subjective feelings.

Share:

Join the Beta

Be among the first to experience Safe-Flow. Get early access + exclusive breathing guides.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Related Articles

Reviews & Analysis

James Nestor's "Breath" Book Review: Key Takeaways for Practice

A comprehensive review of the bestselling book that changed how millions think about breathing, with actionable insights you can implement today.

January 5, 20256 min read
Reviews & Analysis

Patrick McKeown & Oxygen Advantage: Method Comparison

An in-depth look at the Oxygen Advantage method, how it differs from other breathwork approaches, and why breathing less might help you more.

January 3, 20256 min read
Reviews & Analysis

Top 5 Meditation Apps Compared: Calm vs Headspace vs Others

An honest comparison of the most popular meditation and breathwork apps, helping you choose the right one for your goals and preferences.

January 2, 20258 min read